Explore more: SEO Foundations add-on · Monitoring history · All live demos
Your AI-search operating system
What changed—and what should you do next?
See the latest checks, important changes and work worth doing next.

Your example pulse shows what changed and what needs a closer look. Open an update to see what we checked and what it means.
Your latest pulse
Fictional July and August 2026 panels using the same questions and services. The dates and next check are examples, not an active schedule. No AI service is called.
Weighted observed encounter, mention, citation, recommendation, and citation-share rates. Missing components remain missing and never become zero.
Are you becoming easier for AI to understand and recommend?
Readiness and observed visibility stay separate so a better website is never confused with a guaranteed AI mention.
Readiness improvement is not calculated until two months have fully evaluated audits. Confirmed points and coverage are shown without implying a final-score change.
What needs your attention
Start with these updates. Repeated alerts are grouped; the details and evidence stay one click away.
7 distinct updates · repeated alerts combined. Open an update for the reason and next step.
PositiveObserved mention rate rose by 46.7 percentage points.2 matching alerts grouped
Why it matters: This changed across the disclosed prompt panel; it is an observation, not proof that a site change caused it.
What to do: Open the changed questions and retained citations before creating a fix.
2 matching alerts were grouped in this retained summary.
Show the evidence ↗ (opens a new tab)PositiveObserved citation rate rose by 25 percentage points.
Why it matters: This changed across the disclosed prompt panel; it is an observation, not proof that a site change caused it.
What to do: Open the changed questions and retained citations before creating a fix.
Show the evidence ↗ (opens a new tab)ReviewObserved recommendation rate fell by 26.7 percentage points.
Why it matters: This changed across the disclosed prompt panel; it is an observation, not proof that a site change caused it.
What to do: Open the changed questions and retained citations before creating a fix.
Show the evidence ↗ (opens a new tab)Show 4 more updates
Positivecommunity-discussion.demo.example appeared for the first time in the latest retained source set.
Why it matters: The category source landscape changed for the disclosed prompt panel.
What to do: Review whether the source is owned, fixable, earnable, or external.
Positivecommunity-guide.demo.example appeared for the first time in the latest retained source set.
Why it matters: The category source landscape changed for the disclosed prompt panel.
What to do: Review whether the source is owned, fixable, earnable, or external.
Positivelocal-directory.demo.example appeared for the first time in the latest retained source set.
Why it matters: The category source landscape changed for the disclosed prompt panel.
What to do: Review whether the source is owned, fixable, earnable, or external.
Positivesuncrestbath.example appeared for the first time in the latest retained source set.
Why it matters: The category source landscape changed for the disclosed prompt panel.
What to do: Review whether the source is owned, fixable, earnable, or external.
Observed results after verified work
GEO closes the loop without pretending timing proves causation.
B02 · Example: clearer service-area information
VerifiedFoundNo observed change
Mentioned+46.7 points
Cited+25 points
Recommended-26.7 points
C02 · Example: a new customer-answer section
VerifiedRun the next dated panel to observe what changed after this verified fix.
Fictional workflow example. No real website was changed. A measured difference after a fix does not prove that the fix caused it.Help your page answer a question we tested
GEO selects a question from your monitoring checks. It may reveal a gap in your page—not how many customers asked it. Quill suggests an outline using your confirmed facts and saved sources.
Who are the best bathroom remodelers in Central Florida?
- Your brand was not mentioned
- Your website was cited
- Your brand was not recommended
Review Quill’s suggested outline
A clear answer to: Who are the best bathroom remodelers in Central Florida?
Recommended format: Answer Ready Supporting Content
- Answer the question directly in the opening two sentences.
- Explain who the answer applies to and any material limitations.
- Support every factual or comparative claim with the retained evidence below.
- Add a practical next step without promising an AI ranking or citation.
What Quill has done: Prepared this outline. This plan is not a finished article, and Quill has not published anything here.
- Choose the right page. You or your website person decides where the answer belongs: usually the matching service, product, menu or FAQ page. Ask your AI to suggest the exact section and explain why. Do not paste it into an unrelated page. If nothing fits, review a proposed new page first.
- Copy the plan and request a draft. Send it to your website person or paste it into your AI. Confirm missing facts, then review both the wording and where it will go.
- Approve, back up, then add it. In this handoff, you or your website person makes the website change. Copying a plan does not connect your AI to your site. Supported agent work in Fix Squad is a separate flow that shows its connection and approval requirements.
- Check the result. Open the updated page and save its URL and change date. Use GEO’s next scan to check the page; later AI checks can show whether answers changed. A published fix does not guarantee a recommendation.
View the text to copy
Help me turn this GEO content outline into a useful draft. Do not publish or edit my website. Question GEO tested: Who are the best bathroom remodelers in Central Florida? This is a controlled monitoring question, not evidence of customer search volume. First ask for my website and the relevant page. Recommend the best existing service, product, menu or FAQ page and the exact section where this answer belongs. Explain why. If no existing page fits, propose a new page for approval. Do not assume the homepage is the destination or paste the content anywhere. I or my website person must confirm the placement. Suggested outline: 1. Answer the question directly in the opening two sentences. 2. Explain who the answer applies to and any material limitations. 3. Support every factual or comparative claim with the retained evidence below. 4. Add a practical next step without promising an AI ranking or citation. Ask me to confirm missing business facts. Do not invent services, prices, results or credentials. Show me a draft and the proposed placement for review, not a live edit. After I approve the wording and location, my website person or I can back up the site and add the content. Keep the live URL and change date so GEO can check the page and compare later answers. Do not promise that AI will recommend me.
Fictional owner-confirmed facts and sample sources. This is an outline to copy and review, not a finished article or a live website edit.
Which sources appeared in your AI checks
These websites were returned as sources for GEO’s questions. They are not all problems to fix. Open a question count to see what was asked and which source links came back.
A citation is a source link attached to an AI answer. Several links or repeat checks can add to the count; it is not a count of customers or new leads.
You control these pages. Check the cited page and improve any missing or unclear information.
suncrestbath.example
These may be business listings or profiles. Claim or sign in to the profile, then check your name, hours, location and services.
local-directory.demo.example
These are independent publishers or directories. Offer useful facts or a relevant story; they decide whether to include you.
community-guide.demo.example
These pages belong to someone else. Watch what they say and request a correction if a business fact is wrong.
community-discussion.demo.example
Fictional sources illustrate the four groups. Open a source to read its sample evidence without leaving the demo.
Every result, source and verified-fix receipt in this demo is fictional. No customer website was changed, and a change over time does not prove what caused it.